Iro training

Quality Training in Cochlear Implant Electrode Position Assessment: A Prospective Experimental Study | BMC medical training

  • Lee CS, Nagy PG, Weaver SJ, Newman-Toker DE. Cognitive and systemic factors contributing to misdiagnosis in radiology. Am J Roentgenol. 2013;201(3):611–7.

    Google Scholar article

  • Busby LP, Broker JL, Glastonbury CM. Bias in radiology: the how and why of failures and misinterpretations. X-rays. 2018;38(1):236–47.

    Google Scholar article

  • Graber ML, Franklin N, Gordon R. Misdiagnosis in internal medicine. Arch Med Intern. 2005;165(13):1493–9.

    Google Scholar article

  • Braun LT, Zwaan L, Kiesewetter J, Fischer MR, Schmidmaier R. Misdiagnosis by medical students: results from a prospective qualitative study. BMC Med Educ. 2017;17(1):1–7.

    Google Scholar article

  • Kahneman D. Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux; 2011. p. 19–89.

    Google Scholar

  • Ericsson KA, Krampe RT, Tesch-Römer C. The role of deliberate practice in acquiring expert performance. Psychol Rev. 1993;100(3):363–406.

    Google Scholar article

  • Ericsson KA, Harwell KW. Deliberate practice and proposed limits to the effects of practice on the acquisition of expert performance: why the original definition matters and recommendations for future research. Before Psychol. 2019;10:2396.

    Google Scholar article

  • Klein JR, Roodman A. Blind analysis in nuclear and particle physics. Annu Rev Nucl Part Sci. 2005;55:141–63.

    Google Scholar article

  • Dror IE, Thompson WC, Meissner CA, Kornfield I, Krane D, Saks M, et al. Letter to the editor – context management toolkit: a linear sequential unmasking (LSU) approach to minimizing cognitive biases in forensic decision-making. J Forensic Sci. 2015;60(4):1111–2.

    Google Scholar article

  • Krane DE, Ford S, Gilder JR, Inman K, Jamieson A, Koppl R, et al. Sequential unmasking: a way to minimize observer effects in forensic DNA interpretation. J Forensic Sci. 2008;53(4):1006–7.

    Google Scholar article

  • Cohen LT, Xu J, Xu SA, Clark GM. The invention relates to improved and simplified methods for specifying the positions of the electrode strips of a network of cochlear implants. Am J Otol. 1996;17(6):859–65.

    Google Scholar

  • Verbist BM, Skinner MW, Cohen LT, Leake PA, James C, Boëx C, et al. Consensus panel on a cochlear coordinate system applicable in histological, physiological and radiological studies of the human cochlea. Otol Neurotol. 2010;31(5):722–30.

    Google Scholar article

  • Xu J, Xu SA, Cohen LT, Clark GM. Cochlear view: postoperative x-ray for cochlear implantation. Am J Otol. 2000;21(1):49–56.

    Google Scholar article

  • Eisenhut F, Lang S, Taha L, Doerfler A, Iro H, Hornung J. Merged volume rendered flat panel computed tomography for postoperative cochlear implant assessment. Clin Neuroradiol. 2020;30(4):721–8.

    Google Scholar article

  • Struffert T, Hertel V, Kyriakou Y, Krause J, Engelhorn T, Schick B, et al. Imaging of cochlear implant electrode array with flatbed scanner and conventional multislice scanner: comparison of image quality and radiation dose. Acta Otolaryngol. 2010;130(4):443–52.

    Google Scholar article

  • Mewes A, Brademann G, Hey M. Comparison of perimodiolar electrodes: imaging and electrophysiological results. Otol Neurotol. 2020;41(7):e934–44.

    Google Scholar article

  • Shewhart WA. Economic control of the quality of the manufactured product. New York: Van Nostrand; 1931.

    Google Scholar

  • McGraw KO, Wong SP. Form inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. psychological methods. 1996;1(1):30–46.

    Google Scholar article

  • Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline for selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15(2):155–63.

    Google Scholar article

  • Noble JH, Schuman TA, Wright CG, Labadie RF, Dawant BM. Automatic identification of cochlear implant electrode arrays for postoperative evaluation. In: Med Imaging 2011 Image Process, vol. 7962; 2011. p. 796217.

    Google Scholar Chapter

  • Zhao Y, Dawant BM, Labadie RF, Noble JH. Automatic localization of cochlear implant electrodes in CT. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2014;17(Pt 1):331–8.

    Google Scholar

  • Noble JH, Dawant BM. Graph-based automatic localization of cochlear implant electrodes in CT. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2015;9350:152–9.

    Google Scholar

  • Bennink E, Peters JPM, Wendrich AW, Jan Vonken E, Van Zanten GA, Viergever MA. Automatic location of cochlear implant electrode contacts in CT. Ear Hear. 2017;38(6):e376–84.

    Google Scholar article

  • Zhao Y, Labadie RF, Dawant BM, Noble JH. Validation of techniques for automatic localization of cochlear implant electrodes using μCTs. Imaging J Med. 2018;5(03):1.

    Google Scholar article

  • EN ISO 9000:2015, Quality management systems – Fundamentals and vocabulary.

    Google Scholar

  • EN ISO 9001:2015: Quality management systems – Requirements.

    Google Scholar

  • Soffa DJ, Lewis RS, Sunshine JH, Bhargavan M. Disagreement in interpretation: a method for developing benchmarks for quality assurance in imaging. J Am Coll Radiol. 2004;1(3):212–7.

    Google Scholar article

  • Ruutiainen AT, Scanlon MH, Itri JN. Identify benchmarks for discrepancy rates in preliminary interpretations provided by radiology trainees at an academic institution. J Am Coll Radiol. 2011;8(9):644–8.

    Google Scholar article

  • Montgomery DC. Introduction to statistical quality control. New York: Wiley; 1996.

    Google Scholar

  • Wald A. Sequence analysis. New York: Wiley; 1947.

    Google Scholar

  • ES page. Continuous inspection schemes. Biometrics. 1984;41(1–2):100–15.

    Google Scholar

  • Van Rij AM, McDonald JR, Pettigrew RA, Putterill MJ, Reddy CK, Wright JJ. Cusum as an aid to the early assessment of the surgical trainee. Br J Surg. 1995;82(11):1500–3.

    Google Scholar

  • Hammond EJ, McIndoe AK. Cusum: a statistical method for assessing competence in practical procedures. Brother J Anaesth. 1996;77(4):562.

    Google Scholar article

  • Novick RJ, Stitt LW. The Learning Curve of an Academic Cardiac Surgeon: Using the CUSUM Method. J Card Surg. 1999;14(5):312–20.

    Google Scholar article

  • Bolsin S, Colson M. The use of the cusum technique in assessing trainees’ skills in new procedures. Int J Qual Heal Care. 2000;12(5):433–8.

    Google Scholar article

  • Balkany TJ, Eshraghi AA, Yang N. Modiolar proximity of three perimodiolar cochlear implant electrodes. Acta Otolaryngol. 2002;122(4):363–9.

    Google Scholar article

  • Husstedt HW, Aschendorff A, Richter B, Laszig R, Schumacher M. Non-destructive three-dimensional analysis of the electrode near the modiolus. Otol Neurotol. 2002;23(1):49–52.

    Google Scholar article

  • Saunders E, Cohen L, Aschendorff A, Shapiro W, Knight M, Stecker M, et al. Changes in threshold, comfort level and impedance as a function of electrode-mudiolar distance. Ear Hear. 2002;23(Suppl 1):28–40.

    Google Scholar article

  • Van Wermeskerken GKA, Van Olphen AF, Graamans K. Imaging electrode position in relation to electrode function after cochlear implantation. Eur Arch Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. 2009;266(10):1527–31.

    Google Scholar article

  • Verbist BM, Joemai RMS, Briaire JJ, Teeuwisse WM, Veldkamp WJH, Frijns JHM. Cochlear coordinates with regard to cochlear implantation: an individually clinically applicable three-dimensional computed tomography-based method. Otol Neurotol. 2010;31(5):738–44.

    Google Scholar article

  • Esquia Medina GN, Borel S, Nguyen Y, Ambert-Dahan E, Ferrary E, Sterkers O, et al. Is the electrode-modiolus distance a prognostic factor for hearing performance after cochlear implantation surgery? Audiol Neurotol. 2015;18(6):406–13.

    Google Scholar article

  • Long CJ, Holden TA, McClelland GH, Parkinson WS, Shelton C, Kelsall DC, et al. Examining the Electro-Neural Interface of Cochlear Implant Users Using Psychophysics, CT Scans, and Speech Understanding. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2014;15(2):293–304.

    Google Scholar article

  • Davis TJ, Zhang D, Gifford RH, Dawant BM, Labadie RF, Noble JH. Relationship between electrode-to-modiolus distance and current levels for adults with cochlear implants. Otol Neurotol. 2016;37(1):31–7.

    Google Scholar article

  • Van Der Beek FB, Briaire JJ, Van Der Marel KS, Verbist BM, Frijns JHM. Intracochlear position of cochlear implants determined using computed tomography versus fit levels: higher threshold levels at basal turn. Audiol Neurotol. 2016;21(1):54–67.

    Google Scholar article

  • Fernandes V, Wang Y, Yeung R, Symons S, Lin V. Effectiveness of skull radiography in determining cochlear implant insertion depth. J Neck and head surgery Otolaryngol. 2018;47(1):1–7.

    Google Scholar article

  • Svrakic M, Friedmann DR, Berman PM, Davis AJ, Roland JT, Svirsky MA. Measurement of cochlear implant electrode position from intraoperative post-insertion skull radiographs. Otol Neurotol. 2015;36(9):1486–91.

    Google Scholar article

  • Escudé B, James C, Deguine O, Cochard N, Eter E, Fraysse B. Cochlear size and insertion depth angle predictions for cochlear implant electrodes. Audiol Neurotol. 2006;11(Suppl 1):27–33.

    Google Scholar article